2007

Social Engineering 

Home
2007 index
A to Z

 

2007 Sections

BBC agenda 2007 Index
Demolition AKA regionalisation
EU 2007 index
Events 2007
Immigration 2007 index
Law 2007
Multiculture 2007
NHS 2007
Politics 2007 index
Social engineering 2007

Social engineering 2007

English suffering sustained attack from Labour

English whites face Government discrimination

English schools too England focused

All white schools ordered to mix with other races

 

Latest


Entered 09 September 2007: Telegraph 07 September 2007

Church may be placed at risk of being sued by homosexuals

   
Sexual Orientation Regulations may lead to homosexuals suing over sermons condemning homosexuality

 

The new proposals, which may be included in a Single Equality Bill, could allow gays to sue if they heard a sermon that condemned homosexuality

Telegraph article

Church fears lawsuits over gay rights

By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent

Last Updated: 12:01am BST 07/09/2007

 

Church leaders expressed fears last night that Christians could be sued under proposed new laws to protect gays from harassment.

The Government is proposing to introduce the laws to protect individuals from hostile or humiliating “environments” as part of an overhaul of discrimination legislation.

But Christian lawyers and the Church of England warned that Christians could face legal action if they offended gays by expressing the traditional teaching that homosexual sex was immoral.

The row follows the bitter battle last year over the Sexual Orientation Regulations, which many Christians fear will erode religious freedom and are part of a growing secularisation of society.

The Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship said that the new proposals, which may be included in a Single Equality Bill, could allow gays to sue if they heard a sermon that condemned homosexuality.

It added that while a church could “gently refuse membership” to an unrepentant, practising homosexual, “that person, if they felt that they had been put in a 'humiliating position’, could sue the Church.”

The Fellowship also warned that suggestions that local authorities should have a duty to promote gay equality could be “taken too far” and result in state funding being removed from Christian projects.

The Church of England, in its official submission to the Government’s consultation on the Bill, said the proposed harassment laws were unnecessary.
 

Full Telegraph article 

 Top


It would be “crucial” to ensure that a religion’s followers, and not just clergy, could continue “to express the views of their faith about homosexual conduct, including challenging people to lead lives consistent with the teaching of the Church
Church of England

 

Religion and belief seemed to be treated as subordinate to other rights because they were deemed to be a personal choice, but this was “a false analysis”
Church of England

 

09 August 2007 Daily Express
 

English suffering sustained attack from Labour
Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique.

HOW THE GOVERNMENT HAS DECLARED WAR ON WHITE ENGLISH PEOPLE

Thursday August 9,2007
By Leo McKinstry

 

England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population.

In the name of cultural diversity, Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed. In their own land, the English are being turned into second-class citizens.

This trend was highlighted this week by the case of Abigail Howarth, a bright teenager who applied for a training position with the Environment Agency in East Anglia but was turned down because she was too white and English. The post, which carries a £13,000 grant, was open only to ethnic minorities, including the Scots, Welsh and Irish.

...Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed.

 

 

Such social engineering was justified by the Agency on the grounds that minorities were under-represented in its workforce, the parrot cry used by bureaucrats throughout the public sector to justify bias against the English.

Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique. This kind of reverse discrimination is now rife across the state machine, underwritten by the very English tax­payers who are the targets of institutional prejudice.

Although it is technically illegal to restrict jobs to certain ethnic groups, the racially fixated commissars have found a way round that problem by developing training schemes open only to minorities. Under the 1976 Race Relations Act it is permissible to use racial considerations in recruitment to trainee positions such as the one to which Abigail applied.

Such practices are dressed up as “positive action” to widen diversity and, in the words of one Labour council, “to overcome past discrimination”. So HM Revenue and Customs offers work experience jobs, worth up to £15,900 a year pro-rata, to ethnic minority graduates, while the Museums Association has two-year ethnic minority apprenticeships.

 

Similarly, Birmingham City Council gives £16,000 a year to “black and minority ethnic individuals” in its “Positive Action Traineeship Scheme”, and a £10,000 allowance to clerical trainees from “the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities”.

 

Discriminatory training schemes can also be found in ITV, the civil service and the NHS, which boasts “a management development programme specifically designed and tail­ored to the needs of black and minority ethnic midwives”. 

...Home Office admitted, Corby’s population is predominantly “white British”, a terrible sin in our multicultural society.

 

 


It was revealed last year that Avon and Somerset Constab-ulary rejected 186 applications from white men on the grounds that they were already “over-represented” in the force. In the same way, London Mayor Ken Livingstone last month refused to endorse a series of nominations for the London Fire Authority because they were dominated by whites.

And whole towns are beginning to suffer state disapproval. Eighty administrative jobs in the Prison Service have recently been transferred from Corby in Northamptonshire to Leicester because, as the Home Office admitted, Corby’s population is predominantly “white British”, a terrible sin in our multicultural society.

It is a bitter irony that the Labour Government, which works itself into such a synthetic rage over racial prejudice, should practise overt discrimination on an epic scale. The remorseless focus on supporting minorities has led to a perverted ideology of anti-white racism.
...
That is now precisely the mentality that predominates within the machinery of the British state. And our country is dying as a result.+

Full shocking Daily Express article;
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/15991/How-the-Government-has-declared-war-on-white-English-people

Comment on Cross of St George
http://crossofstgeorge.net/news/blog.php

 Top


 

04 August 2007 Daily Mail article

English whites face Government discrimination
"I would not have minded had I been beaten for the position by somebody better able than me."  - Abigail

English girl barred from Government job...because she is wrong kind of white

By MARK NICOL - More by this author »

Last updated at 10:27am on 5th August 2007

 

A teenage science student has been banned from applying for a training programme with the Environment Agency because she is white and English.

The recruitment agency handling the scheme told Abigail Howarth, 18, that there was no point in her submitting an application because of her ethnic background.

But bizarrely she could have applied if she had been white and Welsh, Scottish or Irish.

"I think this is complete nonsense and the Environment Agency should be taking the best people, irrespective of their background."

 

Andrew Selous, Tory MP, South West Bed-fordshire

Abigail, who wanted to join the Agency's flood management programme, saw an advert in a local newspaper offering positions in the Anglia region where she lives, complete with a £13,000-a-year tax-free grant.

It made no mention of the ban on white English applicants, merely noting that candidates from ethnic minorities, such as "Asian, Indian' and "White Other, e.g. Irish, Welsh, Scottish', were encouraged to put themselves forward.

Abigail, of Little Straughton, Bedfordshire, said: "I was really disappointed. To be told being "White English" ruled me out in my home county shocked me. I know why there are positive action training schemes to assist those who are genuinely discriminated against but when it's broken down to this level it seems crazy to me.

"I really wanted to work for the agency and I was very excited - followed by feeling very disappointed.

"I would not have minded had I been beaten for the position by somebody better able than me."

Abigail, who is awaiting the results of A-Levels in environmental science, geography and geology, emailed PATH National Ltd, the company handling applications.

She asked: "Am I correct in assuming that as I am English (White) I need not apply as the preference is for the minorities you have listed, or can I apply anyway?'

Three days later, PATH recruitment officer, Bola Odusi, replied: "Thank you for your enquiry unfortunately the traineeship opportunity in <\[>sic] targeted towards the ethnic minority group to address their under representations in the professions under the Race Relations Act amended 2000."

Such a policy may breach Race Relations legislation as employers must prove ethnic groups are under-represented before using positive discrimination strategies.

The Environment Agency admitted it had 'no evidence that white Welsh, Scottish or Irish workers were under-represented' in the Anglia region.

South West Bedfordshire Tory MP Andrew Selous said: "I think this is complete nonsense and the Environment Agency should be taking the best people, irrespective of their background.

"This is obviously borne out of some idiotic quota system. Abigail should have been able to apply and been judged on her own merits. I will raise this when I have a meeting with the Environment Agency next month." +


Full article here; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=473249&in_page_id=1770

Another position for anyone but English whites;
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/jobs/currentcampaigns/5123.aspx

See also Cllr Ayling’s blog;
Legal Racism; http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/legal-racism/


07 August 2007 Daily Express

BLOGS by Patrick O'Flynn

WHEN BEING WHITE AND ENGLISH IS A CRIME...

 

The idea that an indigenous English person, with no identifiable ethnic minority ancestors, should be made a second class citizen in her own country illustrates the deep sickness afflicting our society.

 Full Express article
 

BBC interview

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/

The pdf document, link below, seems;

  • compiled by people who incessantly invent new terminology and then define that terminology to support their anti-English policy;
  • to employ the lexical chicanery of the statutory bigot;
  • to include the sophistry and carefully contrived language of anti-English prejudice;
  • to include content apparently sponsored by the British state;

http://www.rota.org.uk/downloads/Briefing%20Positive%20Action%20layout.pdf

Charity for ethnic English

http://www.steadfasttrust.org.uk/

 Top


20 July 2007

 

English schools too 'England focused' - Ofsted
Ofsted raised concerns about schools focusing too heavily on aspects of English history

BBC report

Pupil history knowledge 'patchy'

Pupils in primary and secondary schools across England lack an overview of world history and have little sense of chronology, Ofsted inspectors warn.

The watchdog said the curriculum was too England-focused, ignoring the rest of the UK and Europe.

They also complained that after the age of 13, only one in three children studies history at all.

Ministers and Ofsted say a new secondary curriculum from 2008 will address many of the points raised.

The watchdog based its findings on inspections carried out between 2003 and 2007.

It said the biggest issue for school history was its "limited place" in the curriculum and that history in primaries had been neglected in recent years with the focus on literacy and numeracy.

"History, along with some other subjects, has been relatively neglected in primary schools in recent years as schools have focused on literacy and numeracy," the report said.

"History's limited role is also apparent in secondary schools. In Key Stage 4 (the GCSE years), only just over 30% of pupils study history and fewer still post-16."

The inspectors said the subject also faced prejudice, with some policy developers, senior school managers, parents and pupils seeing history as less important or relevant than other subjects.

England focus

Inspectors identified that pupils were poor at establishing a chronology and did not make connections between the areas they had studied. As a result, they were not able to answer the "big questions".

"Although pupils often know something about selected periods or events - for example, children in Victorian times, Henry VIII and his wives or the Aztecs - they are weak at linking this information to form an overall narrative or story."

The report continued: "Pupils of all ages tend to study particular issues in depth but are seldom encouraged to form overviews or draw wider implications."

Ofsted raised concerns about schools focusing too heavily on aspects of English history.

"Those parts of the curriculum relating to Scotland, Wales and Ireland are very largely ignored, as are major European and world themes.

"Importantly too, in many schools, the stories of the people who have come to Britain over the centuries are ignored, even though these include the personal histories of some of the pupils."

Inspectors said "curriculum innovation" could help understanding and counter prejudice and racism.

They said history was linked to debates on citizenship and "Britishness" and could help pupils understand relevant historical contexts.

Primary 'weaknesses'

The report highlighted that most teachers of history in primary schools were non-specialists.

Inspectors said the "limited training and subsequent lack of confidence" of teachers meant they were unwilling to be creative with the curriculum.

"Post-graduate initial teacher training courses for new primary teachers and the subsequent induction year provide very limited experience of teaching history."

Primary schools are urged to devise a more coherent curriculum "that links more closely with pupils' needs and prepares them for life".

The report said the needs of "high-achieving historians" were also being overlooked.

Schools Minister Jim Knight said: "History is already a strong subject in schools but action we are taking on the types of issues raised in today's Ofsted report will help us improve standards even further.

"We agree with many of the points raised by Ofsted and addressed them in our revised secondary curriculum launched last week.

"The new curriculum has strengthened the requirement that all pupils need to have a good chronological understanding of history, this is compulsory at primary Key Stages too.

"Schools must also teach a broad spectrum of local, British, European and world studies at each Key Stage providing pupils with a thorough grounding in historical knowledge."

The Historical Association says it is concerned that timetable changes in schools are further cutting time devoted to history.

Heather Scott, chair of the association's secondary committee, said: "We remain particularly concerned by the growing number of secondary schools ending pupil statutory entitlement to Key Stage 3 history in Year 8 by collapsing the Key Stage into two years.

"In effect, time for history is reduced by a third and the age at which pupils no longer study the subject falls to 13."+

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/6904206.stm

Top


16 July 2007

All white schools ordered to mix with other races
Ofsted inspectors will be handed powers to check schools are meeting the new duty, which comes into force in September.

Daily Mail

All-white schools told to mix with other races or be labelled 'failing'

By LAURA CLARK - More by this author »

Last updated at 22:46pm on 15th July 2007

Comments (3)

Schools with mainly white pupils could be labelled "failing" if they don't encourage children to mix with other races and religions.

Ministers will unveil guidance to heads on how to comply with a new legal duty to promote community relations.

Schools in rural or suburban areas will be urged to twin with multi-ethnic schools, for example by staging joint plays or sporting events.

Faith schools should link up with different denominations while schools with no religious affiliation should arrange trips to churches, mosques and synagogues.

Schools should also bring together local parents from different backgrounds by holding coffee mornings, curriculum evenings and parent and child courses.

Ofsted inspectors will be handed powers to check schools are meeting the new duty, which comes into force in September.

Those judged to be falling short face the prospect of their governing bodies taken over by council hit squads or even closure.+

Full article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=468564&in_page_id=1770

Top


*

Top Home ] 2007 index ] A to Z ]